AI IPFS website builder checklist: review the export before publishing
Evaluate generated sites by their actual files, dependencies, accessibility, metadata, and release behavior—not by a convincing preview.
AI IPFS Website Builder / GENERATE, REVIEW, RELEASE
Judge the exported folder, not just the preview. An AI-assisted workflow becomes useful when its output can be inspected, rebuilt, tested, and published deliberately.
Define the page inventory, static architecture, compiled styling, included assets, and supported interactions before generation. State which features are intentionally absent. Require real routes and completed destinations instead of generic buttons. This turns an open-ended design prompt into a reviewable output contract and makes missing functionality visible before publication.
Stop the preview environment and serve the output as ordinary static files. Check nested pages, assets, script imports, and remote dependencies. Read the content for invented testimonials, statistics, credentials, partnerships, and product features. A generated hosting guide must not accidentally claim to operate a network, and a builder overview must not pretend to contain a working generator.
Treat supplied documents, templates, and retrieved text as untrusted inputs. Do not let instructions embedded in those materials authorize changing DNS, accessing secrets, or publishing private files. Keep production credentials outside the generation step and require review before privileged actions. A narrow workflow makes both accidental mistakes and prompt-injection attempts easier to contain.
Check keyboard navigation, mobile layouts, focus visibility, contrast, image dimensions, routes, metadata, structured data, and feeds. Search compiled files for development URLs and exposed configuration. Record which artifact passed the checks, then retain and publish that exact folder. Generation is the beginning of the process, not evidence that the final output is correct.
Technical reference: OWASP prompt-injection guidance. Review the relevant configuration before applying it to a production environment.
COMMON QUESTIONS
No. This section provides an evaluation and publishing workflow for developers using AI-assisted tools. It does not offer an interactive generation service.
No. Test the actual files under static hosting, including direct nested routes and all required assets, without relying on the preview server.
FIELD GUIDES
Evaluate generated sites by their actual files, dependencies, accessibility, metadata, and release behavior—not by a convincing preview.
Design a content workflow that separates authoring, previews, approvals, static output, and IPFS publication without exposing the CMS to every visitor.